Re: requalification of arm as etch release architecture

[Bill Gatliff <bgat@billgatliff.com>]

Vincent:

> >  - Only being up-to-date for a very poor 94% of the archive currently
> >    and only having built a likewise poor 91% of the archive.
> >    (And thus probably being next in line after m68k, which has just
> >    started being ignored for testing propigation). A lot of this comes
> >    down to build failures, eg perl currently fails to build on arm,
> >    which is really painful for the release team.
> >    
>
> Well yes this is unacceptable, I wasn't aware of it until the IRC
> meeting either :-/ sorry. A chunk of this comes from not having an
> open access machine.
>  

Don't know if it will help or not, but I'll fire up a dpkg-buildpackage 
of perl on my machine here and see what happens.  Someone PLEASE let me 
know if this is stupid.  :)



b.g.

--
Bill Gatliff
bgat@billgatliff.com