Re: Question about the arm autobuilder.
Sven Luther wrote:
>
Hello,
While we're on the subject, does anyone have an idea when the uClinux
code
will build out of the Debian-Arm tool-chain, for arm processors without
MMUs?
I read somewhere that the uClinux code would be integrated into the
main
kernel after version 2.5.49. Atmel uses an embedded ARM7TDMI ARM Thumb
Processor Core.
I specifically have an Atmel AT91EB40 development board, with an
AT91R40807,
that I'd would love to run linux on... Also, if anyone has setup a JTAG
device
connected to a Linux development host, I'd appreciate some direction on
how
to set it up.
Any ideas or advice is most welcome as to how to get any embedded linux
kernel
running on this board, including waiting until these aforementioned
hacks are
integrated into the Debian-arm supported processor tool chain......
James
> Hello, ...
>
> I have a question about the arm autobuilders, and well, since i don't
> know exactly who to ask for a build rescheduling, i ask here.
>
> http://www.debian.org/intro/organization show that Philip Blundell and
> Othmar Pasteka are the responsibles of the arm autobuilders, but since
> it only gives the debian-arm email, i suppose it is best to ask here
> anyway.
>
> I have a package, lablgl, for which a new upload failed to build on arm
> (and alpha). I fixed the package and did a new upload, but the arm
> autobuilder did not trigger a rebuild of the fixed version, so i suppose
> that the package has been put on hold or something such. What is the
> correct action i should take as a maintainer in such case, just wait it
> out, or ask for a rebuilt ? My experience with the ia64 autobuilder is
> that maintainer input is a good thing, but then the arm autobuilder may
> be handled differently.
>
> So, if it is possible, please rebuild lablgl, as it should build fine
> now, it is the only architecture missing for it, and lablgl is a part of
> a larger sub-pool of packages we are currently mini-freezing in order to
> get it into testing, and other packages depend on this one.
>
> As a side note, other package we are waiting one include the latest
> tk8.3 (which failed because it depends on tcl8.3 which was uploaded the
> exact same days as tk8.3, and thus not available), tetex-bin and
> imagemagick.
>
> Friendly,
>
> Sven Luther
>
> --
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-arm-request@lists.debian.org
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Reply to: