Re: BUG: gcc broken
In message <[🔎] 709336484a%peter@erble.freeserve.co.uk>
Peter Naulls <peter@erble.freeserve.co.uk> wrote:
> > > > cc: Internal compiler error: program cpp0 got fatal signal 11
> > > >
> > > > gcc 2.95.3-4, running unstable
> >
> > On what sort of machine? With what CPU? [and of what age?]
> > Running
> > cat /proc/cpuinfo
>
> I'm now seeing this, just to compound all my other build issues.
>
> revision 2's K, isn't it? I can probably swap my SAs over:
>
> Processor : Intel StrongARM-110 rev 2 (v4l)
> BogoMIPS : 190.46
> Hardware : Acorn-RiscPC
> Revision : 0000
> Serial : 0000000000000000
Right, I now have a working 2.4 kernel (having compiled it on an older
2.4 test kernel) and the compiler does work now. Whether that's a
consequence of being built on 2.4 or something new in GCC that relies on
2.4 behaviour, I don't know. (I haven't built 2.2.18 yet, but I will
check on that).
Futher to this, the latest inetd fails to work on 2.2 (again I need to
check on 2.2.18). It reports: 'getrlimit: Function not implemented'
when it starts up.
Peter
--
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Peter Naulls - peter@erble.freeserve.co.uk
Homepage - http://free.prohosting.com/~chocky/
Java for RISC OS and ARM - http://www.java.riscos.org.uk/
Debian Linux on RiscPCs - http://www.erble.freeserve.co.uk/
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Reply to: