[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

[drepper@cygnus.com] glibc-2.0.97

With luck I managed to get all the ARM fixes in.  2.0.97 should work out of 
the box without versioning.  Jim can hopefully give us the latest on what 
happens if you do try to use versioning but in any case this looks like a 
binutils problem rather than a glibc one.

I'd be interested to hear reports of both success and failure.  There will 
still most likely be some problems with floating point because I have a couple 
of outstanding patches there but everything else should be OK.


------- Forwarded Message

To: libc-alpha@cygnus.com, linux-gcc@vger.rutgers.edu
Subject: glibc-2.0.97
Reply-To: drepper@cygnus.com (Ulrich Drepper)
X-fingerprint: BE 3B 21 04 BC 77 AC F0  61 92 E4 CB AC DD B9 5A
Mime-Version: 1.0 (generated by tm-edit 7.108)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
From: Ulrich Drepper <drepper@cygnus.com>
Date: 06 Oct 1998 13:02:13 -0700
Message-ID: <r2yaqtsblm.fsf@happy.cygnus.com>
Lines: 19
X-Mailer: Gnus v5.5/XEmacs 20.4 - "Emerald"
Sender: owner-libc-hacker@cygnus.com
Precedence: bulk


I've uploaded to


sources and diffs (relative to 2.0.96) for glibc 2.0.97.  Not much
changed since 2.0.96, only a few dozend bug fixes and header file
improvements.  The biggest change is that db-1.85 is built and

Please test it and let me know either way.


- -- 
- ---------------.      drepper at gnu.org  ,-.   1325 Chesapeake Terrace
Ulrich Drepper  \    ,-------------------'   \  Sunnyvale, CA 94089 USA
Cygnus Solutions `--' drepper at cygnus.com   `------------------------

------- End of Forwarded Message

Reply to: