Re: socket.h ...
Philip Blundell <philb@gnu.org> writes:
> >Seems as if sys/socket.h includes bits/socket.h, which includes
> >asm/socket.h and linux/socket.h. Ick.. what a mess... my 386 has
> >socketbits.h included by sys socket.h... On the netwinder,
> >linux/socket and bits/socket seem to conflict, defining a lot of the
> >same things...
> I don't think linux/socket.h should be getting pulled in. Are you
> sure you're not including that some other way?
It could be because he's using the old gcc 2.8.1 package I made -
which included a lot of "fixed" include files in
/usr/lib/gcc-lib/include . When I built that package (months ago), we
had a different glibc package installed (actually, the glibc was built
by Corel, not us). That mismatch might be the source of some
problems.
I uploaded a newer gcc package yesterday (which I've been sitting on
for several weeks, unfortunately, because I wanted to upload egcs
next, but got stuck in glibc). It goes with the glibc-corel 2.0.94
from my ftp site.
Cheers,
- Jim
Reply to: