Hi Steinar, On Saturday 01 August 2009, Steinar H. Gunderson wrote: > > Also, since I have prepared two DSAs for apache2 recently, I am > > extremely annoyed by the source package split (the release team > > feels the same way). Therefore, I want to move apache2-mpm-itk > > into the apache2 source package and add you as uploader. > Sure -- I'd be happy with the Debian Apache team maintaining > Debian's version of mpm-itk. It was done this way originally > because the Apache team didn't want to carry around anything that > upstream didn't feel like taking in in a short timeframe. I would still prefer to have some separation between -itk and the rest. But the source package split causes a lot of hassle for the release and security teams, which I now think outweighs the positive aspects of the separation. We will just have to make very clear in the description of the binary pacakge that it is not an official MPM. If I find the time, I will merge the packages with the next apache2 upload (unless you want to do it). I have added you to pkg-apache and I still expect you to deal with -itk specific bugs in any case (but there don't seem to be many). Cheers, Stefan
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.