Alle 21:54, venerdì 13 ottobre 2006, Tollef Fog Heen ha scritto: > Seriously, there is no reason not to mount /proc > in any and all chroots. Ok, I resign this "battle". But I think that it is not a clean way to proceed in a "create live environment" sense of a package, /proc filesystem means the "current hardware and kernel system" pack of informations and not a "generic debian system" informations nor an "hardwareless" or "kernelless" pack of information, so even if apache2 team wont fix this bug, asking to have /proc installed have only meanings of "current system" installs, not a generic one. So this bug is valid for all packages that requires /proc to finish the installation. This issue is not blocking debian-live, I admit, but is blocking a "clean and nice" way to do system administration, and since the fix could be easy, why not provide it? If I dig maintainers scripts and provide a patch, could that be integrated asap or will just be a useless effort by me? -- ESC:wq
Attachment:
pgpCVKXqj1WzM.pgp
Description: PGP signature