Re: runlevel priority: mysql vs. apache
On 2006-07-11 Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
> | So as you plan to go to 20 we will have the following?
> | 19 start mysql
> | 20 start apache/apache2
> | 80 stop apache/apache2
> | 81 stop mysql
> I was planning on keeping the S91 start link, but move the stop link
> from 91 to 09. I don't think the mysql packages would need adjustment
> at all for that?
> Sorry for not being clear about just changing the stop priority, but I
> don't see a point in changing the start priority. Apache can depend
> on quite a lot of other services and few services depend on apache
> being started, so it makes sense for it to start late.
Ok, I change my runlevels to 19up/81down to be a bit before most of the other
servers to avoid similar problems in the future but you can go with