[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#373290: closed by Thom May <thom@debian.org> (Re: Bug#373290: libapr0-dev: Outdated header files?)

owner@bugs.debian.org (Debian Bug Tracking System) writes:

> This is an automatic notification regarding your Bug report
> #373290: libapr0-dev: Outdated header files?,
> which was filed against the libapr0-dev package.
> It has been closed by Thom May <thom@debian.org>.
> Their explanation is attached below.  If this explanation is
> unsatisfactory and you have not received a better one in a separate
> message then please contact Thom May <thom@debian.org> by replying
> to this email.
> Debian bug tracking system administrator
> (administrator, Debian Bugs database)
> From: Thom May <thom@debian.org>
> Subject: Re: Bug#373290: libapr0-dev: Outdated header files?
> To: Friedrich Dominicus <frido@q-software-solutions.de>, 373290-done@bugs.debian.org
> Date: Wed, 14 Jun 2006 10:27:40 +0100
> You're attempting to compare APR 1.2 from upstream (which is available in
> debian in the libapr1{,-dev} packages to APR 0.9, which is a
> differently
Well this is difficult to understand the debian package system
description says:

unstable (net): the Apache Portable Runtime
2.0.55-4: alpha amd64 arm hppa i386 ia64 kfreebsd-i386 m68k mips
mipsel powerpc s390 sparc

and well that seems to go with the apache2 I'm using so I was thinking
this is the most actual library. 

I'm sorry if I did get that wrong, but I hope one can see how 
it has come to this misunderstanding.


Reply to: