[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: reported problem with apache2 + php4



On Tue, Apr 20, 2004 at 12:31:25AM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
> I'm sending this mail because of an installation report which included these
> comments:

Thanks Joey, didn't yet have time to process this.

> > - apache2 was default, but apache2+php4 module = not working

It is, as of today, the php4 module for apache2 is in Sarge. PHP-team:
congratualations.

> > - installing both php4 and php4-cgi, makes apache2 use the cgi version of php4.

Not inlogical, because php4 is for apache 1.3 only.

I filed a bug to make the package names more clear:
#244573: Please rename php4 to libapache-mod-php4, and make php4 dummy depending libapache{, 2}-mod-php4

But, because it is very doubtful this will be done before Sarge is
released, I filed a bug against the package descriptions, which should
be easy solvable, and still be quite effective IMHO:

#244571: php4: Package description suboptimal, might cause confusion to
new sarge installers

> > - apt-get --purge remove apache2 gave warnings about files in /etc (I
> >   didn't touch the config), apache2 remained running after apache2 was
> >   gone.  Installing apache (1.3) didn't make it start running)

There are purge failures already reported in #197986, #237030 and
#239571. Due to the oldness the oldest bug, I think patches are
appreciated, I'll see what I can do about it, but can't promise
anything.

Don't know about the keep-running, seems not reported, and I didn't
report it... Apache maintainers, what do you think?

> > - The php4 readme.debian had outdated info (and very unorganized) about how to
> >   enable the php4 module in apache (you need to run modules-update apache
> >   enable mod_php4), which should be done by postinst imho anyway (didn't
> >   happen, don't know whether it's intentional).

I reported already:
#244564: php4's README.Debian outdated w.r.t. apache1.3

In the php4 (<- binary package) README it's already noted that the
auto-register as module is broken, this is AFAICS not reported though,
and don't know whether this is planned to be fixed.

> > - Installing php4-cgi installed in apache2 automatically... don't know whether
> >   that's how it's supposed to work (php4 should be preferred if both are
> >   available imho)

There is actually a whishlist open against libapache2-mod-php4 to
perform exactly this current behaviour, #228343: Automatic installation
in apache2, but it apparantly isn't closed.

If you install libapache2-mod-php4, it is enabled by default too, if you
install php4-cgi afterwards, the module is still used. Don't know what
happens though if you first install php4-cgi, and afterwards
libapache2-mod-php4. Should be tried IMHO.
 
> Is there a problem with php4 and apache2, and does any of the rest of this
> look like something apache2 should get a bug report for?

Basically most of this is unclearness about that if you want php4
support in apache2, you should NOT install the php4 package, but the
libapache2-mod-php4 package, and that the php4 package's description
doesn't say anything about this doesn't help.

This render IMHO Bug#244571 to something that really should be tried
very hard to be fixed before Sarge, ideally even #244573 too, but the
latter has more risks.


Thank you all for your attention, and for creating those packages. To
make Sarge the greates Debian release ever, a little bit work on the
documentation and usability side still has to be done though.

--Jeroen

-- 
Jeroen van Wolffelaar
Jeroen@wolffelaar.nl (also for Jabber & MSN; ICQ: 33944357)
http://Jeroen.A-Eskwadraat.nl

Attachment: pgpMSS2BPehl2.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: