[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#215133: marked as done (apache-ssl: gcache gives bind: Address already in use because "SSLCacheServerPort 443" in httpd.conf)



Your message dated Fri, 10 Oct 2003 18:05:45 +0100
with message-id <20031010170545.GF27861@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk>
and subject line Bug#215133: apache-ssl: gcache gives bind: Address already in use because "SSLCacheServerPort 443" in httpd.conf
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 10 Oct 2003 16:43:20 +0000
>From root@noc.mnsu.edu Fri Oct 10 11:43:19 2003
Return-path: <root@noc.mnsu.edu>
Received: from (noc.mnsu.edu) [134.29.1.3] 
	by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 1A80MI-00063l-00; Fri, 10 Oct 2003 11:43:18 -0500
Received: from noc.mnsu.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by noc.mnsu.edu (8.12.10/8.12.10/Debian-4) with ESMTP id h9AGhDII030666;
	Fri, 10 Oct 2003 11:43:13 -0500
Received: (from root@localhost)
	by noc.mnsu.edu (8.12.10/8.12.10/Debian-4) id h9AGhDOp030664;
	Fri, 10 Oct 2003 11:43:13 -0500
Message-Id: <[🔎] 200310101643.h9AGhDOp030664@noc.mnsu.edu>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Jeffrey Hundstad <jeffrey.hundstad@mnsu.edu>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
Subject: apache-ssl: gcache gives bind: Address already in use because
 "SSLCacheServerPort 443" in httpd.conf
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.34
Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2003 11:43:12 -0500
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.5 required=4.0
	tests=BAYES_01,HAS_PACKAGE
	version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_10_09
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_10_09 (1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)

Package: apache-ssl
Version: 1.3.28-2
Severity: grave
Tags: sid
Justification: renders package unusable

With my upgrade to 1.3.28-2 today my /etc/apache-ssl/httpd.conf was modified.  It
incorrectly changed:

SSLCacheServerPort /var/run/gcache_port

to

SSLCacheServerPort 443


To fix it... change it back.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux noc 2.4.21-xfs #1 SMP Sun Aug 17 21:42:00 CDT 2003 i686
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C

Versions of packages apache-ssl depends on:
ii  apache-common                 1.3.28-2   Support files for all Apache webse
ii  debconf                       1.3.14     Debian configuration management sy
ii  dpkg                          1.10.15    Package maintenance system for Deb
ii  libc6                         2.3.2-8    GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii  libdb4.1                      4.1.25-9   Berkeley v4.1 Database Libraries [
ii  libexpat1                     1.95.6-6   XML parsing C library - runtime li
ii  libmagic1                     4.04-1     File type determination library us
ii  libssl0.9.7                   0.9.7c-3   SSL shared libraries
ii  logrotate                     3.6.5-2    Log rotation utility
ii  mime-support                  3.23-1     MIME files 'mime.types' & 'mailcap
ii  openssl                       0.9.7c-3   Secure Socket Layer (SSL) binary a
ii  perl [perl5]                  5.8.1-2    Larry Wall's Practical Extraction 
ii  ssl-cert                      1.0-4      Simple debconf wrapper for openssl

-- debconf information:
  apache-ssl/init: true
  apache-ssl/document-root: /var/www
  apache-ssl/server-name: localhost
  apache-ssl/server-admin: webmaster@boron.mnsu.edu
* apache-ssl/enable-suexec: true


---------------------------------------
Received: (at 215133-close) by bugs.debian.org; 10 Oct 2003 17:06:03 +0000
>From willy@www.linux.org.uk Fri Oct 10 12:05:46 2003
Return-path: <willy@www.linux.org.uk>
Received: from parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk (www.linux.org.uk) [195.92.249.252] 
	by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 1A80i2-00053r-00; Fri, 10 Oct 2003 12:05:46 -0500
Received: from willy by www.linux.org.uk with local (Exim 4.22)
	id 1A80i1-0003gD-RN; Fri, 10 Oct 2003 18:05:45 +0100
Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2003 18:05:45 +0100
From: Matthew Wilcox <willy@debian.org>
To: Jeffrey Hundstad <jeffrey.hundstad@mnsu.edu>,
	215133-close@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Re: Bug#215133: apache-ssl: gcache gives bind: Address already in use because "SSLCacheServerPort 443" in httpd.conf
Message-ID: <20031010170545.GF27861@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk>
References: <[🔎] 200310101643.h9AGhDOp030664@noc.mnsu.edu>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <[🔎] 200310101643.h9AGhDOp030664@noc.mnsu.edu>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i
Sender: <willy@www.linux.org.uk>
Delivered-To: 215133-close@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.5 required=4.0
	tests=EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION
	version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_10_09
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_10_09 (1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)

On Fri, Oct 10, 2003 at 11:43:12AM -0500, Jeffrey Hundstad wrote:
> Package: apache-ssl
> Version: 1.3.28-2
> Severity: grave
> Tags: sid
> Justification: renders package unusable
> 
> With my upgrade to 1.3.28-2 today my /etc/apache-ssl/httpd.conf was modified.  It
> incorrectly changed:
> 
> SSLCacheServerPort /var/run/gcache_port
> 
> to
> 
> SSLCacheServerPort 443

This bug was already reported in 215110.  1.3.28-3 should fix
the problem, so I am closing this report.

-- 
"It's not Hollywood.  War is real, war is primarily not about defeat or
victory, it is about death.  I've seen thousands and thousands of dead bodies.
Do you think I want to have an academic debate on this subject?" -- Robert Fisk



Reply to: