[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#170759: marked as done (apache-ssl: Shouldn't the lock be apache-ssl.lock, not apache.lock?)



Your message dated Fri, 25 Jul 2003 14:53:21 +0200 (CEST)
with message-id <Pine.LNX.4.56.0307251452010.2020@trider-g7.ext.fabbione.net>
and subject line (no subject)
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at maintonly) by bugs.debian.org; 26 Nov 2002 05:30:24 +0000
>From anthony@derobert.net Mon Nov 25 23:30:24 2002
Return-path: <anthony@derobert.net>
Received: from ip68-100-128-98.nv.nv.cox.net (mx02.derobert.net) [68.100.128.98] 
	by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
	id 18GYIi-0005ES-00; Mon, 25 Nov 2002 23:30:24 -0600
Received: from bohr.local ([192.168.65.5])
	by mx02.derobert.net with esmtp (Exim 3.22 #1 (Red Hat Linux))
	id 18GYIe-00079T-00; Tue, 26 Nov 2002 00:30:20 -0500
Received: from anthony by bohr.local with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
	id 18GYIb-00017i-00; Tue, 26 Nov 2002 00:30:20 -0500
From: Anthony DeRobertis <asd@suespammers.org>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <maintonly@bugs.debian.org>
Subject: apache-ssl: Shouldn't the lock be apache-ssl.lock, not apache.lock?
X-Mailer: reportbug 1.50
Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2002 00:30:17 -0500
Message-Id: <E18GYIb-00017i-00@bohr.local>
Sender: Anthony DeRobertis <anthony@bohr.local>
Delivered-To: maintonly@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.9 required=5.0
	tests=PGP_SIGNATURE,SPAM_PHRASE_00_01,UPPERCASE_25_50
	version=2.41
X-Spam-Level: *

Package: apache-ssl
Version: N/A; reported 2002-11-26
Severity: minor

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

The default lock in the config file is /var/lock/apache.lock; shouldn't
it be /var/lock/apache-ssl.lock?

- -- System Information
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux bohr 2.4.16 #2 SMP Wed Nov 28 05:25:00 EST 2001 i686
Locale: LANG=en_US, LC_CTYPE=en_US

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.0 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQE94wbs+z+IwlXqWf4RAlucAJ4wccBoOp/3Pyvue0hRxbMy+WLuKgCdHAdn
QEOl0mLHSAptcY617J1zdz8=
=7EYV
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

---------------------------------------
Received: (at 170759-done) by bugs.debian.org; 25 Jul 2003 12:53:33 +0000
>From fabbione@fabbione.net Fri Jul 25 07:53:26 2003
Return-path: <fabbione@fabbione.net>
Received: from port5.ds1-sby.adsl.cybercity.dk (trider-g7.fabbione.net) [212.242.169.198] 
	by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 19g24Y-0007xv-00; Fri, 25 Jul 2003 07:53:23 -0500
Received: from trider-g7.ext.fabbione.net (port5.ds1-sby.adsl.cybercity.dk [212.242.169.198])
	by trider-g7.fabbione.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C93F91
	for <170759-done@bugs.debian.org>; Fri, 25 Jul 2003 14:53:22 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2003 14:53:21 +0200 (CEST)
From: Fabio Massimo Di Nitto <fabbione@fabbione.net>
Sender: fabbione@trider-g7.ext.fabbione.net
To: 170759-done@bugs.debian.org
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.56.0307251452010.2020@trider-g7.ext.fabbione.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Delivered-To: 170759-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.6 required=4.0
	tests=BAYES_30,SIGNATURE_SHORT_SPARSE,USER_AGENT_PINE
	version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_07_20
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_07_20 (1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)


Hi,
	unfortunatly I have no track on when this bug was fixed but the
default config is shipped with /var/lock/apache-ssl.lock, therefor I am
closing this bug.

Fabio

-- 
Our mission: make IPv6 the default IP protocol
"We are on a mission from God" - Elwood Blues

http://www.itojun.org/paper/itojun-nanog-200210-ipv6isp/mgp00004.html



Reply to: