Bug#98161: marked as done (Apache Compares Against Wrong Value when determining which HTTP/1.1 virtual host to serve)
Your message dated 16 Jul 2003 14:26:57 +0200
with message-id <878yqyver2.fsf@yiwaz.raw.no>
and subject line invalid bug
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 20 May 2001 18:11:50 +0000
>From brianr@osiris.978.org Sun May 20 13:11:50 2001
Return-path: <brianr@osiris.978.org>
Received: from bluebox.ne.mediaone.net (osiris.978.org) [24.128.136.238] (qmailr)
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 151XgD-0000EB-00; Sun, 20 May 2001 13:11:49 -0500
Received: (qmail 2853 invoked by uid 1000); 20 May 2001 18:11:49 -0000
Date: Sun, 20 May 2001 14:11:49 -0400
From: Brian Ristuccia <brian@ristuccia.com>
To: submit@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Apache Compares Against Wrong Value when determining which HTTP/1.1 virtual host to serve
Message-ID: <20010520141149.O641@osiris.978.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.15i
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
Package: apache
Version: 1.3.19-1
When deciding which HTTP/1.1 virtual host to serve content for, Apache was
comparing against the hostname in the <VirtualHost hostname> directive
instead of the ServerName directive within that block where it should have
been looking. According to the docs, the name specified in the VirtualHost
directive specifies only the interface and port to listen on, but apparently
1.3.19-1 uses it for more than this.
--
Brian Ristuccia
brian@ristuccia.com
bristucc@cs.uml.edu
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 98161-done) by bugs.debian.org; 16 Jul 2003 12:27:04 +0000
>From tfheen@yiwaz.raw.no Wed Jul 16 07:27:03 2003
Return-path: <tfheen@yiwaz.raw.no>
Received: from vawad.samfundet.no [129.241.93.49]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 19clN8-0004pe-00; Wed, 16 Jul 2003 07:27:02 -0500
Received: from yiwaz.raw.no (s135.ifi.uio.no [129.240.72.135])
by vawad.samfundet.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id 483139D8A
for <98161-done@bugs.debian.org>; Wed, 16 Jul 2003 14:26:59 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by yiwaz.raw.no (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id EF4A095FE6; Wed, 16 Jul 2003 14:26:57 +0200 (CEST)
Sender: tfheen@yiwaz.raw.no
Original-Sender: Tollef Fog Heen <tfheen@raw.no>
X-URL: http://raw.no/
To: 98161-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: invalid bug
Mail-Copies-To: never
From: Tollef Fog Heen <tfheen@raw.no>
Date: 16 Jul 2003 14:26:57 +0200
Message-ID: <878yqyver2.fsf@yiwaz.raw.no>
Lines: 17
User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Delivered-To: 98161-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0
tests=BAYES_10,USER_AGENT_GNUS_UA
version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_06_27
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_06_27 (1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)
As far as I can see, apache is doing what the documentation says it
will:
Each VirtualHost must correspond to a different IP address,
different port number or a different host name for the server,
( http://httpd.apache.org/docs/mod/core.html#virtualhost )
Without showing us your httpd.conf, it's a bit hard to help you find
the problem, since the documentation can be a little confusing.
--
Tollef Fog Heen ,''`.
UNIX is user friendly, it's just picky about who its friends are : :' :
`. `'
`-
Reply to: