A Dimarts 27 Febrer 2007 23:57, Lennart Sorensen va escriure: > On Tue, Feb 27, 2007 at 11:46:17PM +0100, tomek.fizyk@op.pl wrote: > > I don't use the nvidia-glx package - I use the nvidia installer from > > nvidia.com and my libGL.so* files are: > > I prefer my system to not be broken (and using the nvidia installer WILL > result in a broken system at some point). > me too. Always if the maintainer does a good job ... and all the packages that use libGL could use all the libraries optimized for the different drivers. > > libGL.so - > libGL.so.1 > > libGL.so.1 -> libGL.so.1.0.9746 > > libGL.so.1.0.9746 > > > > And everything works fine in my case. And I think it's solved quite well. > > > > I don't understand one thing - if you install the nvidia driver from the > > nvidia-glx package, does it result in some kind of 'layer' between the > > OpenGL application and the driver itself (thru that > > /usr/lib/nvidia/libGL.so.1.xlibmesa file)?? Or is it just another symlik? > > One should just be a diverted file (the nvidia-glx package diverts the > mesa file to avoid a conflict, something the nvidia installer has no > clue how to do, eventually resulting in breakage). what does exactly means a diverted file? Leo -- -- Linux User 152692 PGP: 0xF944807E Catalonia
Attachment:
pgpm5xGQFTetO.pgp
Description: PGP signature