[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: i386 or amd64?



Greg,

On Monday 01 January 2007 18:25, Greg Madden wrote:
> On Mon, 09 Oct 2006 21:30:08 +0200
>
> Thomas Steffen <steffen.list.account@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On 10/8/06, dtutty@porchlight.ca <dtutty@porchlight.ca> wrote:
> > > Other than non-free stuff like flash and openoffice,
> > > is there anything in the main section of i386 that isn't in the main
> > > section of AMD64?
> >
> > A few minor things are missing, such as memtest86, partimage, and of
> > course wine. Also note that most java-packages come without the plugin
> > in 64bit.
> >
> > > In other words, what are people having to use a chroot i386 for?
> >
> > Closed software such as acrobat reader, flash, skype, vmware, picasa,
> > googleearth etc. Most can be installed without a change root, but that
> > is a bit of a struggle.
> >
> > Since you have only 1 GB of RAM, you can go with i386 without any
> > obvious penalty. With amd64 you can get a little bit more performance,
> > but you are also more likely to run into problems, such as the ones
> > mentioned here.
> >
> > Thomas
>
> FYI, the latest VMware runs on 64 bit  linux hosts.

Which  VMware? Just this past Saturday I downloaded & tried to install 
Workstation 5.5.5-29772 and the install failed with a list of missing 
libraries (32-bit, I presume, although I haven't had time to investigate).

Cheers!

cmr

-- 
Debian 'Etch': Registered Linux User #241964
----
"More laws, less justice." -- Marcus Tullius Ciceroca, 42 BC
--------



Reply to: