Re: i386 or amd64?
- To: debian-amd64@lists.debian.org
- Subject: Re: i386 or amd64?
- From: Greg Madden <gomadtroll@gci.net>
- Date: Mon, 1 Jan 2007 15:25:29 -0900
- Message-id: <[🔎] 20070101152529.3f4b991c@myetch>
- In-reply-to: <d7e2700f0610091230h3f6faeyb12be2ab898ba2a3@mail.gmail.com>
- References: <20061007200746.GA1945@pluto> <45281A67.4000901@planet.nl> <20061008010927.GA3703@pluto> <d7e2700f0610091230h3f6faeyb12be2ab898ba2a3@mail.gmail.com>
On Mon, 09 Oct 2006 21:30:08 +0200
Thomas Steffen <steffen.list.account@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 10/8/06, dtutty@porchlight.ca <dtutty@porchlight.ca> wrote:
> > Other than non-free stuff like flash and openoffice,
> > is there anything in the main section of i386 that isn't in the main
> > section of AMD64?
>
> A few minor things are missing, such as memtest86, partimage, and of
> course wine. Also note that most java-packages come without the plugin
> in 64bit.
>
> > In other words, what are people having to use a chroot i386 for?
>
> Closed software such as acrobat reader, flash, skype, vmware, picasa,
> googleearth etc. Most can be installed without a change root, but that
> is a bit of a struggle.
>
> Since you have only 1 GB of RAM, you can go with i386 without any
> obvious penalty. With amd64 you can get a little bit more performance,
> but you are also more likely to run into problems, such as the ones
> mentioned here.
>
> Thomas
>
>
FYI, the latest VMware runs on 64 bit linux hosts.
--
Greg Madden
Reply to: