[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Mixed system: which way better?



On Thursday, 20.04.2006 at 08:26 +0300, Vadym Honcharuk wrote:

> Hi lists,
> 
> since amd64 port for etch/testing repositary have a lot of broken/not
> ported software and application which way is more properly: 1) use
> amd64 base system (netinstall + X Window) with 32bit KDE and App, or
> 2) install i386 system, then install amd64-k8 kernel plus some 64bit's
> software like Nvidia driver, other porting soft...
> 
> As for me, second way looks quite better as my system is workstation
> and many apps not ported yet but I already meet some problems with
> iptables and nvidia driver on it. 
> 
> Q: how possible mix 32bit and 64bit repositary for apt-get?

The truly simplest option, if you want to use this as a desktop, and
wish to use nVidia proprietary drivers and proprietary 32-bit plugins
(e.g. Flash) is just to use a completely 32-bit system.

Alternatively, go for a *full* 64-bit system, with only 32-bit apps
where necessary: you mention KDE, but that's not a problem in my
experience.  Firefox plus proprietary 32-bit plugins might be more of a
candidate for this.

I don't think that "many apps aren't ported yet" is correct assessment:
AFAIK OpenOffice was the only 'major' application with porting
difficulties, but I understand that even this may no longer be so much
of an issue.

In terms of performance on a desktop, you probably won't notice much
difference between 32-bit and 64-bit, so using a plain 32-bit system
might give you everything you need with having to mess around too much.

Dave.
-- 
Dave Ewart
davee@ceu.ox.ac.uk
Computing Manager, Cancer Epidemiology Unit
Cancer Research UK / Oxford University
PGP: CC70 1883 BD92 E665 B840 118B 6E94 2CFD 694D E370
Get key from http://www.ceu.ox.ac.uk/~davee/davee-ceu-ox-ac-uk.asc
N 51.7518, W 1.2016

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Reply to: