Re: when will nvidai-glx and nvidia-kernel-source hit etch? {Scanned} {Scanned} {Scanned}
On Tue, Oct 24, 2006 at 01:43:13PM -0500, Henry Hollenberg wrote:
> Yeah it was already pointed out to me that I must have compiled under
> 2.6.17-amd64 instead of booting into 2.6.18-amd64 first and then running
> the m-a stuff. Lots of steps, boy my butt is getting tired.
>
> Anyway, now I'm up against more missing executables in /usr/bin so I removed
> the unstable lines from sources.list and ran:
>
> dpkg -l | grep ii | cut -d " " -f 3 | xargs -n 1 apt-get --reinstall install
>
> to brute force rebuild all the missing binaries/symlinks I deleted from
> /usr/bin last week.
>
> So far I've added 20 new executables I had previously missed 1884 --> 1904
> on a 'ls /usr/bin | wc'.
How about: grep -l '/usr/bin' /var/lib/dpkg/info/*.list |sed -e 's/.list$//'
That should list which packages should have files in /usr/bin, rather
than every package installed (many of which do not have files in
/usr/bin at all).
--
Len Sorensen
Reply to: