Re: [POLL] To continue 64 or not?
I thinlk you must anwer yourself a question:
What do you need more: 64bits or all the software that is not available for
64bit debian?
I chose 64bits (need 'em for my scientific calculations) though
am having the same problems with flash, ooo, etc, and have to wait
patiently for 64bit versions of the software.
There are other 64bit linux distros that are 32bit compatible, but, as
someone mentioned here some time ago, this 32bit compatiblity makes
them slower than pure 64bit debian).
Użytkownik Andrew Robinson <andrew.rw.robinson@gmail.com> napisał:
>Looking for some constructive feedback on other people's experiences
>with amd64 as a workstation. I have been only using it a few weeks,
>and the setup is a pain due to the amount of 32 bit only programs. I
>am having some issues with:
>
>Eclipse + ExadelStudio plugin (plugin is 32-bit only)
>Firefox + Flash (Flash is 32-bit only)
>OpenOffice
>Cedega
>Wine
>
>Unfortunately, this makes up a decent percentage of what I run daily
>(especially eclipse). I am the type to sacrifice pain for new
>functionality, but this one has got me thinking, is it worth it?
>
>As a server I would think it would be great but as a workstation it
>seems to be a pain. The chroot jail works, but having to maintain the
>apt libraries (I am using etch, so they change fairly often), it more
>of a pain.
>
>For those that have the knowledge, I know that the 64 bit architecture
>is faster due to addressing and such, but is it that noticeable? Also,
>I have read that the 32 kernel still supports the dualcore nature of
>the amd64 even though running in 32 bit mode (is this true, my source
>wasn't 100% reliable).
>
>Just looking for some constructive feedback on other's opinions.
>
>-Andrew
>
>
>--
>To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-amd64-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
>with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
>
Looking for some constructive feedback on other people's experiences
with amd64 as a workstation. I have been only using it a few weeks,
and the setup is a pain due to the amount of 32 bit only programs. I
am having some issues with:
Eclipse + ExadelStudio plugin (plugin is 32-bit only)
Firefox + Flash (Flash is 32-bit only)
OpenOffice
Cedega
Wine
Unfortunately, this makes up a decent percentage of what I run daily
(especially eclipse). I am the type to sacrifice pain for new
functionality, but this one has got me thinking, is it worth it?
As a server I would think it would be great but as a workstation it
seems to be a pain. The chroot jail works, but having to maintain the
apt libraries (I am using etch, so they change fairly often), it more
of a pain.
For those that have the knowledge, I know that the 64 bit architecture
is faster due to addressing and such, but is it that noticeable? Also,
I have read that the 32 kernel still supports the dualcore nature of
the amd64 even though running in 32 bit mode (is this true, my source
wasn't 100% reliable).
Just looking for some constructive feedback on other's opinions.
-Andrew
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-amd64-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Reply to: