Re: [SPAM] Re: Commercial programs in Debian
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Yes, I agree with RMS on this point. He has pointed out that using the
GPL (an not a license that permits a comercial entity to abscond with
the code) superior free (yes, in both senses) _software_ (o/s,
utilities, applications) makes for a better world. High ideals to be sure.
Dave Ewart wrote:
> On Monday, 08.05.2006 at 03:27 -0500, Miller, Marc wrote:
>
>
>>The Debian way is to promote the availability of source code, but is
>>that more important than worldwide adoption in general? The focus
>>should be on capturing the audience first, and converting commercial
>>ISVs to the open source model after you have a captive audience. Am I
>>wrong?
>
>
> Is one of Debian's (formal) aims "worldwide adoption"? I don't think it
> is... Should it be? That's less clear, but again I think not.
>
> If, by making a superior 'free' (in both senses) operating system
> *leads* to wider adoption, then that's a helpful side-effect, rather
> than a goal, in my opinion.
>
> Dave.
- --
Fielder George Dowding, Chief Iceworm .^. Debian/GNU Linux
dba Iceworm Enterprises, Anchorage, Alaska /v\ "etch" Testing
Since 1976 - Over 30 Years of Service. /( )\ User Number 269482
^^-^^ "irad" 301256
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFEXweX2kl99FX0AIkRAgE2AKCEds8Qc/OLq2ISpz7hPy2uGES/MwCdFKaY
00lTZjSY/T8obxC3yB01kME=
=3fSH
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: