Re: multiarch/bi-arch status (ETA) question

To: List debian-amd64 <debian-amd64@lists.debian.org>
Subject: Re: multiarch/bi-arch status (ETA) question
From: Jérôme Warnier <jwarnier@beeznest.net>
Date: Tue, 05 Jul 2005 09:55:54 +0200
Message-id: <[🔎] 1120550154.3894.93.camel@aphrodite.beeznest.net>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 87slyudr1z.fsf@informatik.uni-tuebingen.de>
References: <[🔎] 20050704220308.97801.qmail@web32915.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <[🔎] 87slyudr1z.fsf@informatik.uni-tuebingen.de>

[..]

> But you don't realy gain anything by multiarch for amd64. Only 3
> things come to my mind: OpenOffice, Flash support and w32codecs +
> 32bit mplayer. And only OO is in Debian.
And OOo 2.0, which is due really soon, will natively support 64-bits
architectures.

> MfG
>         Goswin

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: multiarch/bi-arch status (ETA) question
  - From: Goswin von Brederlow <brederlo@informatik.uni-tuebingen.de>

References:
- multiarch/bi-arch status (ETA) question
  - From: Bob Mitchel <bobemitc@yahoo.com>
- Re: multiarch/bi-arch status (ETA) question
  - From: Goswin von Brederlow <brederlo@informatik.uni-tuebingen.de>

Prev by Date: Re: multiarch/bi-arch status (ETA) question
Next by Date: Lots of upgrades in debian/amd64 "stable"/sarge
Previous by thread: Re: multiarch/bi-arch status (ETA) question
Next by thread: Re: multiarch/bi-arch status (ETA) question
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread