Re: Debian AMD64 Archive Move
Ed Cogburn <edcogburn@hotpop.com> writes:
> On Tuesday 10 May 2005 1:33pm, Lennart Sorensen wrote:
>> On Tue, May 10, 2005 at 01:12:22PM -0400, Ed Cogburn wrote:
>> > Just trying to be helpful and point out to those developers that's there
>> > no reason to hold back non-free at all. There isn't a problem, except
>> > the one they are conjuring up. Besides, according to Goswin in the post
>> > you responded to, it could be 3 years, not 3 weeks, by his logic (which I
>> > disagree with as well).
>>
>> So you think Etch will be released soon?
>
>
> If you had read my response to Goswin, you would know we aren't talking about
> release dates for anything, I'm talking about Sid, which will eventually
> become Etch, but obviously will exist for a long time before Etch does. :)
> The issue here is just the co-location of non-free and the AMD64 repository
> (whatever its called, wherever its located). Those 2 will find themselves
> together again on debian.org long before Etch sees the light of day, but the
> point is there is no reason to separate them *now*.
And that is where you are wrong. The amd64.debian.net archive is for
sarge/stable as much as anything else. If the plan where to merge into
debian completly when etch comes to live we wouldn't have moved to a
new server one month before that happens.
MfG
Goswin
Reply to: