Re: Release critical bugs for amd64/sarge
Hello Steve,
thank you for your detailed answer.
On 05-May-06 00:24, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Fri, May 06, 2005 at 08:58:27AM +0200, Andreas Jochens wrote:
> > sarge/main/amd64 BTS Bug Problem description
> > ---------------- ------- ---------------------------------------------------
> > debian-installer #306976+ libdevmapper1.00 does not exist (should be 1.01)
> > debian-installer #307306+ Uses kernel 2.6.10 which is not in sarge
> > syslinux #306123+ amd64 missing from architecture list and FTBFS
>
> I don't believe debian-installer is going to have any more sourceful uploads
> before sarge releases.
I am not sure, but #306976 might occur on i386 too. I have not enough
experience with debian-installer to say anything definite about the
real importance of that bug. I just know for certain that it prevents
building debian-installer on amd64 unless a patch is applied which
's/libdevmapper1.00/libdevmapper1.01/' in build/pkg-lists/monolithic/common.
I did not check it, but it looks like the same may happen on i386.
> A few things you might want to do with this list here:
>
> - gloss the '*' and '+' symbols after the bug numbers
> - re-check against the BTS and/or do rebuild testing, to make sure it's
> current (cal3d, for instance, is bug #305411, fixed in unstable and
> testing)
> - split out the ones you think people could usefully work on doing NMUs for
> (so like, not radiusd-livingston, which has been obsolete for the better
> part of a decade, and ugh, why are we still shipping that?; and not xview,
> which isn't likely to ever get fixed)
> - post it to debian-devel so people can poke through these for the BSP this
> weekend
I will try to fix the list according to your suggestions and post it
to debian-devel, thanks.
Regards
Andreas Jochens
Reply to: