On Fri, May 06, 2005 at 08:58:27AM +0200, Andreas Jochens wrote: > On 05-May-05 13:35, Steve Langasek wrote: > > On Thu, May 05, 2005 at 03:05:49PM +0200, Andreas Jochens wrote: > > > However, even with the patch from #305122, 'ia32-libs' cannot be built > > > and installed in sarge. This is the case because the patch does not > > > remove the 'Depends' and 'Build-Depends' on 'lsb-release' which FTBFS > > > in sarge for amd64. The working ia32-libs version 0.7 did not > > > (Build-)Depend on 'lsb-release'. > > However, lsb-release has been fixed in unstable, and this fixed version has > > been marked for approval into sarge. > My personal list of release critical bugs for amd64/sarge has now only > three bugs left (not counting lsb-release and libmysqlclient-lgpl which > will hopefully enter sarge soon): lsb-release will go in in three days; libmysqlclient-lgpl goes in tomorrow. (all information available via grep-excuses) > sarge/main/amd64 BTS Bug Problem description > ---------------- ------- --------------------------------------------------- > debian-installer #306976+ libdevmapper1.00 does not exist (should be 1.01) > debian-installer #307306+ Uses kernel 2.6.10 which is not in sarge > syslinux #306123+ amd64 missing from architecture list and FTBFS I don't believe debian-installer is going to have any more sourceful uploads before sarge releases. > Of course there are still a few other packages which did not apply the > necessary patches for amd64. However, I think that those packages and > all their dependencies can simply be removed from the amd64/sarge release: A few things you might want to do with this list here: - gloss the '*' and '+' symbols after the bug numbers - re-check against the BTS and/or do rebuild testing, to make sure it's current (cal3d, for instance, is bug #305411, fixed in unstable and testing) - split out the ones you think people could usefully work on doing NMUs for (so like, not radiusd-livingston, which has been obsolete for the better part of a decade, and ugh, why are we still shipping that?; and not xview, which isn't likely to ever get fixed) - post it to debian-devel so people can poke through these for the BSP this weekend Cheers, -- Steve Langasek postmodern programmer
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature