[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: java blackdown and sun



El sáb, 19-03-2005 a las 18:20 -0600, Ron Johnson escribió:
> On Sat, 2005-03-19 at 19:00 -0500, Javier Kohen wrote:
> > Hi Ron,
> > 
> > El sáb, 19-03-2005 a las 17:38 -0600, Ron Johnson escribió:
> > > On Sat, 2005-03-19 at 18:15 -0500, Javier Kohen wrote:
> > > > El dom, 20-03-2005 a las 00:03 +0100, Carsten Prieß escribió:
> > > [snip]
> > > > 
> > > > On the other hand, I only had to make the tiniest workaround in my app
> > > > (probably hundred thousands of lines, I never counted) to make it work
> > 
> > > You want to clarify that for us a little? ;)
> > 
> > Huh, sure, but I don't think it's either relevant to Debian or AMD64,
> 
> The point is that you said you had to fix "hundred thousands of 
> lines", which is a *lot* of lines of code.

I'm afraid I wasn't clear enough. I estimate the size of the whole
application and its dependencies in a hundred thousand lines or so; on
the other hand, the workaround, as I explained, is just one line of
code. That's why I called it "the tiniest workaround" :)

To clarify even more, it's not that I have written that much code
myself, but I rely on many packages from 3rd parties and so I'm counting
those in. Anyway, I ended up unofficially maintaining many of those
packages. Note that I'm talking of Java packages and not Debian
packages.

That reminds me with another problem I faced with 3rd party packages
(but only two of them and it only affected 10-15 files). The IBM
compiler expects UTF-8 encoded files and rejects anything else (that is,
without passing the -encoding switch), whereas the Sun compiler is a bit
more lenient and also accepts non-conforming files (I think it assumes a
Latin-1 encode if they're not valid UTF-8).

Greetings,
-- 
Javier Kohen <jkohen@users.sourceforge.net>
ICQ: blashyrkh #2361802
Jabber: jkohen@jabber.org

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Esta parte del mensaje =?ISO-8859-1?Q?est=E1?= firmada digitalmente


Reply to: