Re: Bug#250086: extipl: please add amd64 support
Taketoshi Sano <email@example.com> writes:
>> It should not use _llseek on i386 either. The right way is to define
>> 64bit file operations (LFS) and use the normal lseek (which then uses
>> 64bit off_t).
> Maybe. I'll consult it with the upstream later.
> # When the extipl began to use __llseek on linux,
> # there are both of libc5 systems and glibc2 systems.
> # So __llseek was the simplest way at that time,
> # or it seemed that, at least.
> # Now I hope that we can use lseek64 on most of linux systems,
> # can't we ?
Just plain lseek will do. With _FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 that is all you
need. I don't see the point of using the lseek64 alias.