Re: Re: fglrx, I should ask...
Jaime Ochoa Malagón wrote:
The ati driver say:
(II) Primary Device is: PCI 01:00:0
(II) ATI: Candidate "Device" section "Radeon_Analog_Output".
(WW) ATI: PCI/AGP Mach64 in slot 1:0:0 could not be detected!
(WW) ATI: PCI/AGP Mach64 in slot 1:0:1 could not be detected!
Yes. This happened to me also when updating my old XFree86
just today. That must have changed recently. Sorry.
In this moment I succeed to run X with the radeon driver, disabling
all the Modules and then enabling one by one.
Many congratulations!
>> I would like to know how the fglrx does on glxgears. My
>> Xorg is up to 2130 FPS with my Radeon 9250. Try this:
>
> I found it...
> Sorry...
>
> (with vesa ~1600x...)
> 2524 frames in 5.0 seconds = 504.800 FPS
> 2760 frames in 5.0 seconds = 552.000 FPS
> 2640 frames in 5.0 seconds = 528.000 FPS
This looks fairly normal. The glxinfo should say "direct
rendering: yes". If not then see:
http://lists.debian.org/debian-amd64/2005/02/msg00401.html
I have been using Xorg Server libraries and modules recently
and have had 2169FPS. I switched back to Xfree today and had
the same speed. Then I remembered the libraries and modules
from Xorg were still in /usr/local. So here are the results
with XFree86 Xserver using Xorg libs and Xorg modules:
Script started on Tue 15 Feb 2005 12:05:37 AM MST
libGL warning: 3D driver claims to not support visual 0x23
libGL warning: 3D driver claims to not support visual 0x24
libGL warning: 3D driver claims to not support visual 0x25
libGL warning: 3D driver claims to not support visual 0x26
libGL warning: 3D driver claims to not support visual 0x27
libGL warning: 3D driver claims to not support visual 0x28
libGL warning: 3D driver claims to not support visual 0x29
libGL warning: 3D driver claims to not support visual 0x2a
libGL warning: 3D driver claims to not support visual 0x2b
libGL warning: 3D driver claims to not support visual 0x2c
libGL warning: 3D driver claims to not support visual 0x2d
libGL warning: 3D driver claims to not support visual 0x2e
libGL warning: 3D driver claims to not support visual 0x2f
libGL warning: 3D driver claims to not support visual 0x30
libGL warning: 3D driver claims to not support visual 0x31
libGL warning: 3D driver claims to not support visual 0x32
8644 frames in 5.0 seconds = 1728.800 FPS
10842 frames in 5.0 seconds = 2168.400 FPS
10842 frames in 5.0 seconds = 2168.400 FPS
10843 frames in 5.0 seconds = 2168.600 FPS
10842 frames in 5.0 seconds = 2168.400 FPS
10842 frames in 5.0 seconds = 2168.400 FPS
10843 frames in 5.0 seconds = 2168.600 FPS
10842 frames in 5.0 seconds = 2168.400 FPS
10842 frames in 5.0 seconds = 2168.400 FPS
10843 frames in 5.0 seconds = 2168.600 FPS
10842 frames in 5.0 seconds = 2168.400 FPS
Script done on Tue 15 Feb 2005 12:06:36 AM MST
That was the same as before! Then I took out the modules and
had about 900FPS until I took out the Xorg libraries left in
/usr/local. I took out the /usr/local and then I got the
same 550FPS with plain Xfree all with glxinfo 'yes'. I hope
they update the DRI inside Xfree soon because that works
too! Anyway, I went back to Xorg X11R6.8.2 again.
I built my own Xorg or there is a version at ubuntu that is
supposed to work easily with Debian. If you want even faster
GLX then the Xorg is much faster than the fglrx.
Congratulations again.
editor@postscript.port5.com
---------------------------------
AMD Athlon64 @2.4Ghz Corsair TwinX1024-3200XL @480Mhz DDR
ASUS A8V Deluxe Pro ASUS Radeon A9250Ge/Td/256
Creative SB Live WD Raptor SATA Maxtor PATA IBM/Okidata
Color PostScript3 Lexmark Mono PostScript2
Debian GNU/Linux debian-amd64/pure64 sid XFree86 4.3.0
Xorg X11R6.8.2 1.5 Mb DSL
Reply to: