[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: aptitude out of date?



Andreas Jochens wrote:
On 04-Aug-11 15:25, Harald Dunkel wrote:

Hi folks,

Using aptitude of the gcc-3.4 pool I got an error message

aptitude: Symbol `_ZTIN4SigC6ObjectE' has different size in shared object, consider re-linking

Rebuilding aptitude did not work: The new binary died with a
core dump immediately.


This sounds strange. I just created a fresh chroot from the gcc-3.4
archive with debootstrap and aptitude seems to run fine from that.

How did you install? Could this be caused by mixing packages from the
gcc-3.3 and the gcc-3.4 archives? In this case maybe 'apt-get install --reinstall libsigc++-1.2-5c102' could help.


I did an upgrade from pure64. (A fresh installation did not
work for me, see my other EMail on this list.)

The suggested reinstall was not possible:

  # apt-get install --reinstall libsigc++-1.2-5c102
  Reading Package Lists... Done
  Building Dependency Tree... Done
  Reinstallation of libsigc++-1.2-5c102 is not possible, it cannot be downloaded.
  0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 2 not upgraded.

(The 2 packages not upgraded are libtiff4 and libtiff4-dev.)

But I could download it from
http://debian-amd64.alioth.debian.org/gcc-3.4/pool/unstable/main/amd64/libs/libsigc++-1.2/
and manually install it. Now the problem seems to be gone.

Why doesn't aptitude use libsigc++ 2.0?


Probably its unrelated, but when I tried to reinstall libsigc++
within aptitude I got an internal error saying

       lqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqk
       x                                                          Apt errors                                                           x
       xE: I wasn't able to locate file for the libsigc++-1.2-5c102 package. This might mean you need to manually fix this package.   ax
       xE: Internal error: couldn't generate list of packages to download                                                             ax
       x                                                            [ Ok ]                                                             x
       mqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqj

Regards

Harri



Reply to: