Kurt Roeckx wrote:
On Mon, May 10, 2004 at 12:35:20PM -0700, Alex Perry wrote:I am still unable to compile a GCC, either 3.3 or 3.4, which passes the built in tests of the compiler. Those tests aren't run by debian rules to build the package, so the fact that we're all able to build the compiler suite has nothing to do with whether those compilers would pass the test suite.Actually, they get run, and it even has a report of them. See /usr/share/doc/gcc-3.3-base/test-summary.gz
So it does. Is it really ok having that many unexpected items ?
From the 3.4 build for gcc it says:
=== gcc Summary ===
# of expected passes 731
# of unexpected failures 17981
# of unexpected successes 43
# of expected failures 15
# of unresolved testcases 5349
# of untested testcases 322
# of unsupported tests 300
gcc-3.4-3.4ds0
=== gcc Summary ===
# of expected passes 24193
# of unexpected failures 8
# of expected failures 69
# of unresolved testcases 4
# of untested testcases 7
# of unsupported tests 268
... different ...