[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Amd64 status



Ramakrishnan Muthukrishnan wrote:

|| On Mon, 3 May 2004 19:39:19 +0200
|| Kurt Roeckx <Q@ping.be> wrote:
q> An autobuilder would be nice.  I'll probably get an amd64 box at
q> the colo site where I could set it up.  The autobuilder would of
q> course require someone to look at all those build logs and take
q> the right actions.

q> I never had any problems with gcc.  It's rather easy to build it
q> too, just need to change a few things for pure64 and it works.
q> Note that gcc is one of those packages that doesn't show up
q> because of the problems with debpool.

q> I even compiled gcc-3.4 from experimental which also seems to
q> work without much problems, but I didn't really do much with it
q> yet.

It will be great, if you guys can put up a short document on how to setup
a pure64 Debian from scratch. I have seen the howto on alioth, may be if
you can update that to include pure64 info, it will be really great. I
think there are more people interested in pure64 port right now than a biarch solution.

This is three e-mails from John and me a while ago; I think they are still true.
I do recommend using the alioth pure64 archive in addition to John's one.

http://lists.debian.org/debian-amd64/2004/debian-amd64-200402/msg00216.html
http://lists.debian.org/debian-amd64/2004/03/msg00003.html
http://lists.debian.org/debian-amd64/2004/03/msg00006.html





Reply to: