[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Official 2.6.8 kernel not booting?



The order of which the disk-device handling modules are loaded is _very_
important.
Len Sorensen helped me sometime ago with the same problem.
The order solved my problem.

On Tue, 2004-11-23 at 21:34 +0100, gape@posta.owca.info wrote:
> Quoting Norval Watson <norv@longforest.com>:
> 
> > Hi Gasper,
> > Which kernel did you use for initial install?
> > I have very similar system: amd64 athlon 3000+, nforce3 chipset,
> > Seagate sata hd, the motherboard is gigabyte ga-k8ns Pro.
> > 2.6.8-1 kernel does not find Seagate SATA HD.
> > Are your sound, network and usb drivers working?
> > Regards,
> > Norv
> >>
> 
> Yes, everything else works perfectly. network module is forcedeth, 
> sound driver
> is i810, usb mouse works fine. But -- if it's 2.6.8 -k7 it works, if it's -k8
> it doesn't. I'm using this .deb
> http://packages.debian.org/unstable/base/kernel-image-2.6.8-9-amd64-k8
> 
> Hm... I'm thinking ... i first installed i386 and then wanted to install a 64
> bit kernel with IA32 support to debootstrap the pure64. Am I going wrong way?
> 
> I just checked debian bug tracker for above kernel image and supposedly it has
> System.map with 0 byte length -
> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=281424
> Could this be it?
> 
> Also Len Sorensen noted there's a missing initrd line in my grub/menu.lst that
> might be causing this and could be related to kernel unable to mount 
> root. I've
> also compiled my own kernel with built in drivers and same happens.
> 
> But then could this be due to RAID in bios? (I don't know if it's enabled or
> not)
> 
> I'm sorry I'm not near the box now, but I'll check this all tomorrow.
> 
> Regards,
> Gasper Zejn
> 
> 
> 
-- 
.O.     Scream, Scream like the silence of the bits.
..O     Dead lies the flag by the feet of the cold one.
OOO     Freedom WILL break the walls of mammon.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Reply to: