[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: USB-Flash <-> uba?



From rom the changelog of kernel-image-2.6.9-amd64 (2.6.9-2):
- Deactivated CONFIG_BLK_DEV_UB

So you have to upgrade and then it will work like usual. I did use ub*
to mount a usb 2.0 disk and it did not work very reliable.

Daniel van Eeden <daniel_e@dds.nl>

On Sat, 2004-11-13 at 19:29 +0100, zeeman wrote:
> Hi!
> 
> I installed a Debian64 on my laptop and it works fine.
> 
> Even the damm acx110 works great with the new snapshot.
> 
> My own vanilla-kernel. No problem.
> 
> But my USB-Flash-Disk behaves very strange:
> When I plug it into the USB-port, the kernel tells me that a new device
> (uba) is found.
> ?
> On my i386-box it's called sda.
> 
> Ok, uba or sda. I guess there where no difference in mounting.
> But there is a difference:
> 
> There is no /dev/uba1, not even a /dev/uba (The "disk" consists of 2
> Paritions, both vfat, recognized by the i386-box as sda1 and sda2).
> 
> I found uba, uba1 and uba2 only in the /sys-tree.
> But there where only informations about the flash-disk (which are right,
> but useless for mounting)
> 
> So, please, can someone tell me how to mount my litte USB-Flash-Disk?
> 
> Greet
> Sebastian
> 
> 
-- 
Daniel van Eeden <daniel_e@dds.nl>

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature


Reply to: