[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Packages which do not compile

Kurt Roeckx wrote:

On Mon, May 10, 2004 at 12:35:20PM -0700, Alex Perry wrote:
I am still unable to compile a GCC, either 3.3 or 3.4, which passes the built in tests of the compiler. Those tests aren't run by debian rules to build the package, so the fact that we're all able to build the compiler suite has nothing to do with whether those compilers would pass the test suite.

Actually, they get run, and it even has a report of them.  See

So it does.  Is it really ok having that many unexpected items ?

From the 3.4 build for gcc it says:
               === gcc Summary ===

# of expected passes            731
# of unexpected failures        17981
# of unexpected successes       43
# of expected failures          15
# of unresolved testcases       5349
# of untested testcases         322
# of unsupported tests          300

               === gcc Summary ===
# of expected passes            24193
# of unexpected failures        8
# of expected failures          69
# of unresolved testcases       4
# of untested testcases         7
# of unsupported tests          268

... different ...

Reply to: