Re: Get rid of the lib64 dir?
On 04-May-08 14:59, Stephen Frost wrote:
> Option 1 is what we've got now, Option 2 doesn't really have any benefit
> to it that I can see, so I don't see any good reason to move to that.
> Option 3 wouldn't be for pure64 and for multiarch there's a better
> solution already.
OK, so let's go on with Option 1 (/lib64 as a symlink to /lib) in
'pure64'. Which package should create that symlink in your opinion?
I think it is now in 'base-files'. It will be important that this
symlink always exists because without it almost every binary program
will stop working since the program interpreter will not be found.
Regards
Andreas Jochens
Reply to: