Re: Moving along Pure64
On Thu, Apr 01, 2004 at 08:31:47PM +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 01, 2004 at 10:38:21AM -0600, John Goerzen wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > We need a few things to happen to get pure64 going better.
> >
> > At the top of the list is a gcc that can build 32- and 64-bit binaries
> > but defaults to 64-bit mode. This is more difficult than it may appear
> > at first.
>
> I think it can do that. I think the only problem is that it
> can't link because it doesn't have any 32 bit libs to link to.
Ahh. That would make sense, and indeed complicates matters a bit.
Let me do some thinking on this for a bit and I'll get back to you...
(if any others have a suggestion, let me know). Perhaps we will need to
put a very stub of multiarch support in pure64 :-)
Reply to: