Re: Concerns about AMD64 port
On Thu, Feb 05, 2004 at 11:40:55AM -0500, Stephen Frost wrote:
> * Tony Hoyle (email@example.com) wrote:
> > With that example you're going to have to rebuild every package for i386
> > as well. Fundamental changes to the packaging system will require that
> > anyway.
> Eh, not necessairly, people were saying that there could be assumptions
> made that if the field isn't there then it's whatever the original way
> was. That would avoid having to rebuild the i386 debs.
I might at this point direct people's attention to the binary-only NMU