On Thu, 2004-02-05 at 09:02, Goswin von Brederlow wrote: > The FAQ has more elaborate instructions. Why don't you follow them? I did, but when I read it, I thought it said you could use woody or sarge for your chroot. I guess either it has changed or I misunderstood the instructions. > Correction to the FAQ are welcome but if you start changing woody or > sarge to sid from the instructions you are inviting trouble. My correction is as follows: "We recommend using woody as your chroot because there are a number of package version conflicts between the amd64 port of sarge and official Debian sarge." > Or if you use debootstrap instead of cdebootstrap for the biarch chroot. The problem is the FAQ doesn't delineate a clear line of distinction between 1) a woody chroot for building the kernel and 2) an amd64 sarge chroot for 32/64 user space. For [1], debootstrap is fine, but for [2] you need cdebootstrap, no? And if you've done [1] with debootstrap, doesn't that fuck you over when you want your chroot from [1] to be converted to [2]? -s
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part