Hello,
On Fri, Dec 03, 2004 at 12:44:00PM +0100, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> I just had to rebuild 800 packages (because I can't be sure which ones
> are broken) for amd64 because the buildd seems to sometimes produce
> packages with missing files.
Wouldn't it be better to fix the autobuilder then? IMHO autobuilder
should be more reliable than a random person.
> Sometimes builds don't work right. Thats life.
Sure, but then the buildds should get fixed.
> PS: A good package would check the existing files against what it
> expects and run some other tests during build.
Ok, I will bear that in mind when I work on my packages next time.
Greetings
Helge
--
Helge Kreutzmann, Dipl.-Phys. Helge.Kreutzmann@itp.uni-hannover.de
gpg signed mail preferred
64bit GNU powered http://www.itp.uni-hannover.de/~kreutzm
Help keep free software "libre": http://www.freepatents.org/
Attachment:
pgp_0aSxjTHpx.pgp
Description: PGP signature