[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Module problem with 2.6.0-test9



Thus spake Jim Crilly:
> Currently running Sarge on a PWS600au and some modules (not all) fail to 
> load with the error "Relocation overflow vs section X" where X varies 
> per module. This isn't new with test9, I noticed it on earlier kernels 
> too but I'm not sure where it started. I compiled the kernel with 3.3.2 
> and ld 2.14.90.0.6, the newest in sarge.  XFS and reiserfs were two 
> modules that I tried to load but had them fail.
> 
> I did see a few posts on lkml about this in even 2.5 kernels but no 
> fixes or even acknowledgments of a problem, is there some form of work 
> around or fix in the works? I'd be more than willing to test workarounds 
> or patches, the box isn't in production for anything.

I had this happen, but chalked it up to a binutils bug (that may or may
not be correct)... my "solution" was to compile a monolithic kernel for
the time being.

-- 
Nathan Poznick <poznick@conwaycorp.net>

Grace is savage and must be savage in order to be perfect. - Charles A.
Stoddard

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Reply to: