[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Returned mail: see transcript for details



josiah, your mail server (or return address) is misconfigured.

Mail Delivery Subsystem [MAILER-DAEMON] wrote:
> The original message was received at Tue, 8 Apr 2003 17:42:35 -0500
> from mcelrath@localhost [127.0.0.1]
> 
>    ----- The following addresses had permanent fatal errors -----
> <josiah@cw.insanetechnology.com>
>     (reason: 550 relaying to <josiah@cw.insanetechnology.com> prohibited by administrator)
> 
>    ----- Transcript of session follows -----
> ... while talking to cw.insanetechnology.com.:
> >>> DATA
> <<< 550 relaying to <josiah@cw.insanetechnology.com> prohibited by administrator
> 550 5.1.1 <josiah@cw.insanetechnology.com>... User unknown
> <<< 503 Valid RCPT TO <recipient> must precede DATA

> Reporting-MTA: dns; draal.physics.wisc.edu
> Received-From-MTA: DNS; localhost
> Arrival-Date: Tue, 8 Apr 2003 17:42:35 -0500
> 
> Final-Recipient: RFC822; josiah@cw.insanetechnology.com
> Action: failed
> Status: 5.1.1
> Remote-MTA: DNS; cw.insanetechnology.com
> Diagnostic-Code: SMTP; 550 relaying to <josiah@cw.insanetechnology.com> prohibited by administrator
> Last-Attempt-Date: Tue, 8 Apr 2003 17:42:36 -0500

> From: Bob McElrath <bob+debian-alpha@mcelrath.org>
> To: "Wm. Josiah Erikson" <josiah@cw.insanetechnology.com>
> Cc: debian-alpha@lists.debian.org
> Subject: Re: Ethernet strangeness on EV6 kernel 2.4.20
> 
> Wm. Josiah Erikson [josiah@cw.insanetechnology.com] wrote:
> > Hello all,
> > 	I have debian sarge with kernel 2.4.20 on a Compaq XP1000 (500Mhz
> > EV6 with 512MB of RAM), and the ethernet randomly "freezes" all the time,
> > for anywhere from 1 second to 30 seconds or so. I've tried this with three
> > different ethernet cards - an RTL8139, a 3c905-TX, and the original
> > DECChip tulip card. All exhibited exactly the same behavior. I tried
> > changing the ethernet cable, and plugging it into an HP 10Mbit switch
> > instead of the Cisco 3500XL that it's normally plugged into. Does anybody
> > have any clues as to why this would be? Is more information needed? Should
> > I report this to the kernel list instead? I can send my kernel config if
> > that would be useful (it's a custom kernel, as all of mine are)
> > Thanks!
> 
> BTW I also had lots of errors in the kernel log:
> Apr  5 19:17:15 bestor kernel: eth0: Tx ring dump,  Tx queue 535658 /
> 535598:
> Apr  5 19:17:15 bestor kernel: eth0:     0 200ca000.
> Apr  5 19:17:15 bestor kernel: eth0:     1 000ca000.
> Apr  5 19:17:15 bestor kernel: eth0:     2 000ca000.
> 
> ...
> Apr  5 19:17:15 bestor kernel: eth0: Printing Rx ring (next to receive
> into 293216, dirty index 293216).
> Apr  5 19:17:15 bestor kernel: eth0:     0 00000001.
> Apr  5 19:17:15 bestor kernel: eth0:     1 00000001.
> Apr  5 19:17:15 bestor kernel: eth0:     2 00000001.
> ...
> 
> Cheers,
> Bob McElrath [Univ. of Wisconsin at Madison, Department of Physics]
> 
>     "You measure democracy by the freedom it gives its dissidents, not the
>     freedom it gives its assimilated conformists." -- Abbie Hoffman
> 




Cheers,
Bob McElrath [Univ. of Wisconsin at Madison, Department of Physics]

    "You measure democracy by the freedom it gives its dissidents, not the
    freedom it gives its assimilated conformists." -- Abbie Hoffman

Attachment: pgpnSuMV2UlqX.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: