[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: AlphaServer GS140 (8400)



Greetings,

The 7.2 RH Alpha distribution, was tested on the GS160.  Although this 
hardware it is not officially supported by HP on the RH-7.2 distribution, it 
should just work. 

The update 2.4.18 kernel from HP was recently booted on a GS160 system without 
a graphical console.  This was done for the testing other systems features.  
It may or may not be complete.  

As far as I know Linux has not been tried on the GS140 aka Turbo-Laser system, 
but it should run $MS NT.

I hope this helps.

Best Regards,


--George

On Tuesday 23 September 2003 07:03 pm, Pasi Pirhonen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, Sep 23, 2003 at 05:40:47PM -0500, Kelledin wrote:
> > On Tuesday 23 September 2003 05:22 pm, Pasi Pirhonen wrote:
> > > No it's not. This is AlphaServer 8400 (upgraded to GS140) and
> > > you're talking about GS160, which is AFAIK different machine.
> >
> > Ah sorry, my bad.  I apparently misread it. :/
>
> nope
>
> > As for the GS140/8400...Linux support is apparently not so great.
> >
> > :(  To the best of my knowledge, the problem is supporting the
> >
> > PCI buses in that thing.  If a generic kernel doesn't work, it's
> > liable to require some kernel hacking to fix this.
> >
> > Perhaps we could get the docs from HP?  This is an ancient
> > machine, but you never know.
>
> I really don't know what HP is doing. As they are obviously supporting
> linux/alpha and they have all the documentation. The problem might be
> the will for supporting this kind of archs. Don't really know about
> that either. Compaq previously released even 'RedHat 7.2', which is
> mark for 'support', but is it potically correct to let linux run on
> this kind of hardware :)
>
> > The show-stopper isn't bootstrapping from SRM to the Linux kernel
> > so much as it is getting the Linux kernel to actually deal with
> > the machine.  So that leaves testing via bootfloppy as an
> > option, so that's a little more convenient.  Just start with a
> > kernel compiled for SMP-generic and work from there.
>
> MOP would be much more easy to boot it up for testing that any floppy
> will ever be.
>
> The idea for my posting was basically 'there is machine if someone has
> some wild ideas for testing code'
>
> > Somehow, I NEVER heard of alilo, even booting Woody on my Alpha?
> > Maybe I missed it.  I've been using aboot.
>
> my bad this time. I ment aboot naturally. From my PC-based background i
> traslated it as 'Alpha bootloader as Alpha LILO' :)



Reply to: