George France [france@handhelds.org] wrote: > There have been many patches of the past several month, but you will not see > them on the kernel.org mailing list. 2/3 of the patches that get into > kernel.org are done very very quietly. The best way to see these patches is > to use bitkeeper to see the recent patches submitted by Richard or Ivan along > with others. :-) > > yes the stock kernels have benn broken for a while, but most users do not use > the stock kernels and most alpha developers have or know where to get good > bits, so it really does not matter, except for new users. Maybe I should put > a small article about this on alphalinux.org. (yes, I host alphalinux.org > for Richard Payne ) Yes please! The hobby community is growing quite large, and we don't magically know where to get the secret alpha stuff! :) (or maybe I'm just out of the loop :) Cheers, -- Bob > On Wednesday 23 April 2003 05:29 pm, you wrote: > > George France [france@handhelds.org] wrote: > > > ROFLOL! > > > > > > It is not a question of holding the patches. It is more of a question of > > > acceptability and timing. The maintainers have had most of these patches > > > for months. The devil is in the details caused by the submaintainers and > > > Linus. > > > > Sorry I didn't mean to be funny...maybe I misunderstand the pecking > > order here. ;) > > > > Anyway it's been over a year since I saw any significant patches for > > alpha. Several stock kernel versions did not compile out of the box or > > are outright broken on alpha... And I have experienced a number of > > problems myself, mostly VM and scheduler related... > > > > I have initiated discussion on the debian-alpha list, hopefully we will > > get your patches into the stock debian kernel. > > Bob McElrath [Univ. of Wisconsin at Madison, Department of Physics] "You measure democracy by the freedom it gives its dissidents, not the freedom it gives its assimilated conformists." -- Abbie Hoffman
Attachment:
pgpGYl6c7ya2O.pgp
Description: PGP signature