Re: What have we learned? (WAS -RE: Idea: Reponse to the responses( was RE: Interesting idea....(at least I think so) ))
On Fri, 26 Apr 2002 rmurray@debian.org wrote:
> The autobuilder is currently running on lully, which is more capable than
> any of the other alpha machines available. Indeed, it is one of the top two
> fastest buildds.
Ah, ok. I wasn't sure what machine it was moved to. Yes, lully is more
than capable of doing both :-) In fact, I'll see if I still have a spare
18GB drive to send in to add to lully. Last time that I checked, it had
adequate disk space, but more never hurts :-) Alternatively, if I still
have the drive free, it can be used on another, more needy arch (it's SCA,
so fair warning).
> We current have three alphas available for developer access. faure (potato),
> lully (woody), and escher (woody).
I *totally* forgot about escher :-) Good point. Perhaps Branden (note
the correct spelling this time, Branden :-P) is the best candidate for
this one :-)
> arm has one developer accessable machine rameau, running potato. There is
> insufficient disk space for chroots for general use. debussy has the
> available hardware, but has not been returned to the colo for several months
> now. powerpc has one developer accessable machine voltaire, running sid.
> There isn't enough space for chroots for general use, but given that it
> runs sid, it isn't that much of a problem. Additional arm machines can
> be accessed by contacting pb, the port leader, an additional alpha is
> available by contacting rkrusty.
Yes, I have access to both, personally (I own a ppc and have access to two
arm machines now), so I'm covered, at least. I have heard others asking
about debussy, though, so I was wondering how ARM was doing as far as
acquiring more hardware.
C
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-alpha-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Reply to: