Re: Flightgear crashes.
On Thu, 12 Dec 2002, Peter Petrakis wrote:
> Considering the scope of this package and the work of porting it properly
> would entail. Would we be better off building it with taso??? If it's not an
> often used package, better to have it work (albet slow) instead of just
> failing. If enough people start using it then porting it could become a
> priority. In the meantime, It's better than nothing... All things considered.
I would say no. It would be a much better effort to actually port it,
especially since it will help the rest of the 64-bit archs sooner or
later. Plus, IIRC, even -taso won't fix all of the problems in
A new upstream was just uploaded in the past day (new upstream), so it may
be worth trying that one first anyway...some of the problems may already