Re: EB64+

[Noah Ackerman <noah@nack.org>]

On Monday 09 September 2002 07:14 pm, Rob Byrnes wrote:
> At 16:03 9/09/2002 -0700, Noah Ackerman sent this up the stick:
> >Has anyone had any luck with woody on an EB64+?
> >
> >I have an Aspen Alpine (which should be similiar) and it doesn't seem to 
like
> >the MILO image or the generic kernel at all.  I cross built an EB64+ 
install
> >kernel (and drivers.tgz) and used an old MILO image (either from slink or
> >RedHat 5.2, I am not sure which) and eventually got a woody on the Alpine.
> >If it's the same for EB64+, I thought I might try submitting an EB64+ 
subtree
> >like jensen and nautilus already have.
> 
> I have Woody running on a Cabriolet (PC64) - which seems to think at kernel 
> compile time that it's an EB64+ (apparently, PC64 was derived from 
> EB64+).  I use srm/aboot rather than arc/MILO however.
> 
> Any particular reason you are running arc/MILO?

Yeah, the Alpine only has one EPROM, which holds ARC.  Aspen used to have a 
replacement EPROM with SRM, but I missed the last one by about 2 years.

> 
> Cheers,
> Rob
> 
> 
> -- 
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-alpha-request@lists.debian.org
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact 
listmaster@lists.debian.org
> 
>