Re: bigloo/alpha 2002-07-26-1 segfault investigation
On Tue 30 Jul 2002, Yann Dirson wrote:
> Hi alpha team,
>
> The buildd logs for bigloo 2.5a+really2.5b-beta-2002-07-26-1 fails
> with one generated program exiting with code 139 (presumably
> segfaulting), whereas -2 did build successfully.
>
> Given the small changes I introduced in -2 I can't understand why
> there would be a difference here. Would it be possible that sbd
> re-runs the -1 build to be sure it was not a transient problem on the
> machine ?
Ehhh, why? Isn't the fact the new version builds fine more important?
It could be something like a new compiler installed on the build system
that leads to it compiling OK now.
Paul Slootman
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-alpha-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Reply to: