Re: gcc 3.0 for potato
On Mon, 6 Aug 2001, Stefan Schroepfer wrote:
> After some investigation, this looks like a (small) compiler bug.
> Linking my C++ stuff manually against libsupc++.a, I was able to
> get it to work.
It's probably the same problem that I've been trying to work on for weeks
now: hidden/weak symbol linkage with DSOs. Because of binutils problems,
I haven't had time to really find a solution in gcc to this problem. If
anyone has time to look at gcc 2.95.x, please do :-)