Re: Raid-1 woes
On Sat, Jun 09, 2001 at 12:18:10AM -0400, Christopher C. Chimelis wrote:
>
> I figured that. If you can, try compiling the same code with gcc-3.0 with
> both -O and -O2 and see what it generates. We have a better shot at
> correcting the problem if it still exists in 3.0.
With gcc-3.0 -O2, it's a lot worse. The last loop where the fault was
observed is totally stuffed, e.g., the loop condition is now the first thing
that gets tested after (disk <= 0).
-O looks alright.
--
Debian GNU/Linux 2.2 is out! ( http://www.debian.org/ )
Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/
PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt
Reply to: