Re: Static apt and dpkg done
On 9 May 2000, David Huggins-Daines wrote:
> On architectures that have never used libc5, ldd comes from the glibc
> package, whereas on the others, it comes from the ld.so package. I
> guess we should make the behaviour consistent, but seeing what
> happened last time I messed with ld.so, someone else should probably
> do it :-)
It's my understanding that this will be a non-issue with the advent of
glibc 2.2, since it will include ldconfig and ldd for all
architectures. If this is true and we intend to use the glibc versions,
then the behaviours will be consistent regardless :-)
C
Reply to: