[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: X now working - except gl



Here's the relevent section (for illustration purposes) from the logfile:

(II) LoadModule: "glx"
(II) Loading /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/extensions/libglx.a
(II) Module glx: vendor="The XFree86 Project"
        compiled for 4.0.1d, module version = 1.0.0
        ABI class: XFree86 Server Extension, version 0.1
(II) Loading extension GLX
(II) Loading sub module "GLcore"
(II) LoadModule: "GLcore"
(II) Reloading /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/extensions/libGLcore.a
(EE) LoadModule: Module GLcore does not have a GLcoreModuleData data
object.
(II) UnloadModule: "GLcore"
Cannot load the GL core library: GLcore


Ok, this looks like no fun to figure out :-(  There is a .data section in
/usr/X11R6/lib/modules/extensions/libGLcore.a (in the GLcoremodule.o obj
file), although it doesn't have anything really in it.  I'll take a poke
at checking into this.  If you're really interested in what is really in
there, here's the contents according to objdump:

Contents of section .data:
 0000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000  ................
 0010 c5fd23ef 3a02dc10 04040004 01000000  ..#.:...........
 0020 00000000 00000000 01000000 00000000  ................
 0030 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000  ................
 0040 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000  ................
 0050 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000  ................

..and the symbol table entry:
0000000000000048 g     O .data  0000000000000018 GLcoreModuleData

-----------

(II) UnloadModule: "glx"
(II) Unloading /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/extensions/libglx.a
(EE) Failed to load module "glx" (invalid module, 0)
(II) LoadModule: "pex5"
(WW) Warning, couldn't open module pex5
(II) UnloadModule: "pex5"
(EE) Failed to load module "pex5" (module does not exist, 0)


FYI, this is harmless.  The pex5 stuff hasn't been made 64-bit clean yet,
so it's disabled (as it was in 3.3.x).  I guess SGI hasn't found time to
really port it or are hoping that one of us will do it (probably me :-P).





Reply to: